Author: Omid David
Date: 12:43:38 08/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 19, 2002 at 10:09:12, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On August 19, 2002 at 08:17:39, Omid David wrote: > >>On August 18, 2002 at 19:05:54, Daniel Clausen wrote: >> >>>On August 18, 2002 at 15:47:13, Omid David wrote: >>> >>>[snip[ >>> >>>>As I said before, the 97 match was a poker game. IBM won by cheating, took >>>>the money, and ran away: "That's it folks, I've won. Have a nice >>>>evening!". >>> >>>Cheating, huh? Care to prove it if you claim such a thing? So and so many people >>>claiming they did cheat doesn't count as a proof though. (it more likely is >>>people being frustrated that 'a machine beat human kind' or something like that. >>>Anyone who thinks that this game (or the upcoming Kasparov-comp or Kramnik-comp >>>games) have anything to do with science is a fool. >>> >>>Sargon >> >>When humans are accused of cheating, they take doping tests. When computers are >>accused of cheating, they submit full logs, something Deep Blue did partially >>and incompletely. > >Did Kasparov take a doping test? Where is it? No one accused Kasparov of cheating. > >Miguel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.