Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 10:20:08 08/13/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 13, 1998 at 12:55:25, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On August 13, 1998 at 10:06:53, Mark Young wrote: >> Now that we all know the >>facts about the Fritz 5 and Rebel 10 match. Will you follow your own logic and >>admit Fritz 5 is a strong program. > > >No - i have no good results. My friends have no good results. We all have no >autoplayer, but we have bought fritz and bravely upgraded it. >We have 200 Mhz machines and when we play manually, fritz gets only >2nd class results. >Draws, losses. also wins. But not these good results enrique, moritz and the >ssdf-guys get. > >I see no reason to admit that fritz is the strongest program, after all the bad >results and games I have seen, just because a bunch of people seeing as deep >friends of chessBase (otherwise they would not have got the autoplayer) >get beautiful results with it. Did you notice that Rebel 9 won my tournament? Would it cross anybody’s mind that if my games were suspected of partiality in favor of Chessbase Ed would post them on Rebel’s home page? I don’t find acceptable your throwing mud on people you disagree with. Enrique >If the customer at home is unable to reproduce the results, they are worth >nothing. > >All other programs support auto232, because they have nothing to hide and >they allow the customer to reproduce the results. > >I will admit that fritz is the strongest program, when I have these results. >As long as my friends and I don't have these superior results, i will say the it >is good. > >it may score top results, but the games are horrible. >And in no way it gets results BETTER than other programs. > >Maybe the autoplayer can produce the results. But not my fritz here. >Here fritz plays exactly like in paris. Stupid. drawish and not succesful. > > > >>Or do you admit that your logic does not >>include Fritz 5 when the facts turn against your personal feelings, and instead >>turn in favor of Chess Base and Fritz 5. Again you made the claim. This is your >>own logic. Will you now back away from it? If you do does not this show that you >>have just been running a smear campaign because of your own personal feeling >>about chess base. Will you not respond? > > >When I get good , best results by fritz, I have no problems saying that i have >good results. I would still not like the style, but have no problems to claim >that it is the strongest program. > >I have also no problems to call nimzo98 very strong. Or Junior. I have >no problems with them because they play better chess as Fritz. > >If you think this is a campaign, I can only say: this is always said. > >But who pays this day ?! Saitek ? Hegener+Glaser because I liked MM5 ? >Marty, because I wrote a nice article about Mchess ? Don ? Because i liked >Rex-chess ? Novag, because I liked Super-Forte-C ? Ed ? Because I liked Rebel8 ? >Maybe Bob, because crafty leads my tournament ?! > >Of course they all pay me :-)) > >I am a rich man.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.