Author: martin fierz
Date: 01:57:47 08/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2002 at 03:38:29, Mike S. wrote: >On August 20, 2002 at 01:03:48, martin fierz wrote: > >>(...) >>what i found really interesting about nunn's comparison is things like >>tartakower's Qxf6+??, which i would not have expected. the problem is, of these >>guys there are only very little games published, of course only their best. the >>rest has been forgotten, and rightly so :-) > >Yes... I have compared your 2 examples with the Karlsbad 1911 tournament book, >with comments by Vidmar. He gave ?? to Süchting's move O-O??, but did not >comment on Tartakover's Qxf6?. oh, you have the tournament book. nunn also had something to say about that. it amounts to "forget about it", but i don't have his book in front of me to get you an exact quote. > >(Süchting probably was happy that a6 was pinned, and overlooked that the d6 >square was guarded by Black; without that, Nd6+ could have forked Black's K and >Q after ...Qxb5.) > >I agree to what you wrote about Nunn + computer of course. > >Regards, >M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.