Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 11:07:08 08/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2002 at 10:54:20, Sune Fischer wrote: >Half the programmers here should get a Ph.D if this is the standard for a >masters. As Marc Boulé pointed out in another post, a master's thesis doesn't require any new material. A PhD requires completely original work. I think people are mixing up the requirements and thinking it all has to be new material. That's just one thing I've noticed in reading all of the replies. I've never written a master's thesis, or read very many, so I can't personally say whether this is a good one or not. I enjoyed it though, even if I already knew most of it. I think regardless of whether or not it's a good thesis, it is a good paper. In reading it I got many new ideas (not directly from the paper, but it made me think of new ideas). I think it is similar to how they recommend that you re-read a chess book after every 200 point ELO improvement, because you will understand things you didn't pick up on before. Anyway, according to the requirements put forth by Marc Boulé in his response, this sounds like a master's thesis to me, but not a PhD thesis. Russell
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.