Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 12:10:31 08/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 19, 2002 at 23:06:49, Uri Blass wrote: >I guess that this is a bug in the Fritz interface(people suggested me to use >Shredder for yace in the past and I read that shredder is faster for yace >but I am used to chessbase). I don't think, that Yace will be slower on the CB interface. However, current CB interfaces (that support UCI engines) have one disadvantage for the sort of backwards analysis you do. They do not support the UCI "info string", and don't show to the user, what the engine wants to show the user. Under Shredder 5 (and probably classic Shredder CB) Yace would tell you, with which depth the position was learned already, and you would be able to conviniently see, to what depth you need let Yace calculate, so that the learning can be overwritten (if needed). Regards, Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.