Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 12:32:10 08/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2002 at 15:13:12, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On August 20, 2002 at 14:42:08, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On August 20, 2002 at 14:23:05, irv wrote: >> >>>I wonder how much better the average run of the mill GM would be if he were >>>allowed the use of a top notch program and hardware .For example take Boris >>>Gulko and put him a big tourn with the worlds top 10 .Gulko having the use of a >>>computer the rest of the players not having that advantage . Would that be >>>enough to have him win the event or would he actually do woarse than he would do >>>otherwise?????????? >> >>I don't see any reason why he would do worse. I think he would probably develop >>his own ideas first, then use the computer for checking his tactical variations >>mostly. Kramnik said something to that effect when speaking about advanced >>chess. He said something along the lines of how the biggest thing he liked about >>it was that he didn't have to do all of the tactical analysis and he could let >>the computer do that for him, and he could focus more on his strategy. I'm not >>sure how much of an improvement a GM like Gulko would get from using a program >>against the world's top 10, but I see no reason why it would hinder his >>performance. >> >>Russell > > >Kasparov has the higher rating ever achieved by any player, and Boris Gulko has >a plus score against Kaspy without the help of any computer. If you provide GM >Gulko the assistance of a computer he would becomes a monster against either >Kramnik or Kasparov. > >PS: I believe that GM Gulko is NOT as good as he was when he faced Kasparov, but >with the assistance of a computer, he could probably still beat Kasparov and the >other nine best players. > >Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.