Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 00:24:23 08/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2002 at 01:42:07, Mike S. wrote: >On August 20, 2002 at 17:25:43, Uri Blass wrote: > >>(...) >>No reason to be surprised. >>This test was designed to put Fritz on top because the analysis was done by >>Fritz to decide about the positions. > >What exactly do you mean? > >Do you really mean, "designed to put Fritz on top"? If not - and I assume (and >hope) you didn't mean that - then I suggest to be a bit more careful. Now it >sounds like an accusation. There is a danger when constructing test-set if you use one spesific program to confirm the correctness of the position. If you use f.ex. Fritz 5 to check position, it is as excpected if a newer version (Fritz 7) would find the solution within shorter time. I have no idea if this is true for this testset. Odd Gunnar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.