Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:25:23 08/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2002 at 07:49:10, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On August 20, 2002 at 20:27:18, martin fierz wrote: > >In these days all programs were so bad that games were decided by >who didn't give away most pieces *usually*. > >So in that respect all games from then are biased as the level of >*every* participant was 600 points lower than they are now. Note that I looked only in comp-human games because I know thet the top programs of today are more than 400 elo better than most of their computer opponents(Cray blitz is an exception). Note only that Fritz3(p90) Wchess(p90) (2 of their opponents) were better than most of their opponents because most of their games were in the time that p90 did not exist. It is logical to guess that the average level of their computer opponents in 1992-1995 was 600 elo weaker than the top programs of today with the best hardware of today in comp-comp games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.