Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: UCI versus Winboard

Author: José Carlos

Date: 05:58:44 08/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 21, 2002 at 08:49:31, Steffen Jakob wrote:

>On August 21, 2002 at 08:47:58, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote:
>
>>
>>>If you are going to add more things to WinBoard, it'll just become more
>>>horrible. A horrible design doesn't fix itself by adding more cruft to it.
>>
>>>--
>>>GCP
>>
>>Whats so horrible ? As far as I can see sjeng works perfectly with winboard
>>protover 2.
>
>It's not well documented which commands can be send during search and how the
>engine should behave exactly (e.g. "setboard", "force").
>
>Greetings,
>Steffen.

  Then why not simply document them correctly?

  José C.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.