Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: UCI versus Winboard

Author: Steffen Jakob

Date: 06:04:35 08/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 21, 2002 at 08:58:44, José Carlos wrote:

>On August 21, 2002 at 08:49:31, Steffen Jakob wrote:
>
>>On August 21, 2002 at 08:47:58, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>If you are going to add more things to WinBoard, it'll just become more
>>>>horrible. A horrible design doesn't fix itself by adding more cruft to it.
>>>
>>>>--
>>>>GCP
>>>
>>>Whats so horrible ? As far as I can see sjeng works perfectly with winboard
>>>protover 2.
>>
>>It's not well documented which commands can be send during search and how the
>>engine should behave exactly (e.g. "setboard", "force").
>>
>>Greetings,
>>Steffen.
>
>  Then why not simply document them correctly?

Dont ask me, ask Tim. :-)

Greetings,
Steffen.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.