Author: Bas Hamstra
Date: 06:29:53 08/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2002 at 09:04:35, Steffen Jakob wrote: >On August 21, 2002 at 08:58:44, José Carlos wrote: > >>On August 21, 2002 at 08:49:31, Steffen Jakob wrote: >> >>>On August 21, 2002 at 08:47:58, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>>If you are going to add more things to WinBoard, it'll just become more >>>>>horrible. A horrible design doesn't fix itself by adding more cruft to it. >>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>GCP >>>> >>>>Whats so horrible ? As far as I can see sjeng works perfectly with winboard >>>>protover 2. >>> >>>It's not well documented which commands can be send during search and how the >>>engine should behave exactly (e.g. "setboard", "force"). >>> >>>Greetings, >>>Steffen. >> >> Then why not simply document them correctly? > >Dont ask me, ask Tim. :-) > >Greetings, >Steffen. IMO it would be a substantial improvement if the protocol _only_ allowed handling of commands in force mode (with a few exceptions like "?" and "force" to be able to abort a search). Bas.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.