Author: José Carlos
Date: 06:35:54 08/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2002 at 09:29:53, Bas Hamstra wrote: >On August 21, 2002 at 09:04:35, Steffen Jakob wrote: > >>On August 21, 2002 at 08:58:44, José Carlos wrote: >> >>>On August 21, 2002 at 08:49:31, Steffen Jakob wrote: >>> >>>>On August 21, 2002 at 08:47:58, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>If you are going to add more things to WinBoard, it'll just become more >>>>>>horrible. A horrible design doesn't fix itself by adding more cruft to it. >>>>> >>>>>>-- >>>>>>GCP >>>>> >>>>>Whats so horrible ? As far as I can see sjeng works perfectly with winboard >>>>>protover 2. >>>> >>>>It's not well documented which commands can be send during search and how the >>>>engine should behave exactly (e.g. "setboard", "force"). >>>> >>>>Greetings, >>>>Steffen. >>> >>> Then why not simply document them correctly? >> >>Dont ask me, ask Tim. :-) >> >>Greetings, >>Steffen. > >IMO it would be a substantial improvement if the protocol _only_ allowed >handling of commands in force mode (with a few exceptions like "?" and "force" >to be able to abort a search). > >Bas. Absolutely. And I think it's perfectly doable, if someone is willing to continue Tim's work. José C.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.