Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: UCI versus Winboard

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 12:09:48 08/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 21, 2002 at 06:29:32, Daniel Clausen wrote:

>After having read these comments and having a closer look on the xboard/winboard
>protocol (hey, I even implemented a few commands :) I came to the conclusion
>that I don't like any of these.
>
>xboard/winboard-protocol is too 'messy' for my taste (the ping-command (or the
>need for it) is just horrible in my POV) and UCI has too much control over the
>engine for my taste. That and no-one wrote an UCI-interface for X11, AFAIK. :)
>
>So.. anyone wants to write a 3rd protocol? :)
>
>Sargon


Dann Corbit has already volunteered (sort of).  Check out his message:

http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?246734



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.