Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:31:05 08/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2002 at 01:46:39, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On August 21, 2002 at 23:04:30, K. Burcham wrote: > >> >>I was using Gandalf to analyse a position, and left running >>longer than what I meant to, got busy with new race car. >>I think this is the longest I have let a program run. >> >>notice depth 20 in one hour. >>and then 95 more hours for depth 24. >>took 53 hours to go from depth 22 to depth 23. >>I found this interesting. >>kburcham > >Indeed very interesting and showing that the general rule (3 more time to get >next ply) does not apply to Gandalf. >Kurt We cannot say based on one position. It is possible that other programs also do not need 3 more time to the next ply in the relevant position. I do not have gandalf5 and only gandalf4.32 but my experience with gandalf does not suggest that gandalf has better branching factor than other programs. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.