Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:31:05 08/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2002 at 01:46:39, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On August 21, 2002 at 23:04:30, K. Burcham wrote: > >> >>I was using Gandalf to analyse a position, and left running >>longer than what I meant to, got busy with new race car. >>I think this is the longest I have let a program run. >> >>notice depth 20 in one hour. >>and then 95 more hours for depth 24. >>took 53 hours to go from depth 22 to depth 23. >>I found this interesting. >>kburcham > >Indeed very interesting and showing that the general rule (3 more time to get >next ply) does not apply to Gandalf. >Kurt We cannot say based on one position. It is possible that other programs also do not need 3 more time to the next ply in the relevant position. I do not have gandalf5 and only gandalf4.32 but my experience with gandalf does not suggest that gandalf has better branching factor than other programs. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.