Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 09:09:28 08/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2002 at 17:15:00, Russell Reagan wrote: >On August 21, 2002 at 15:01:19, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On August 21, 2002 at 07:14:39, Russell Reagan wrote: >> >>>On August 21, 2002 at 07:07:12, Steve Maughan wrote: >>> >>>>>They have a long way to go to catch up with Winboard... >>>> >>>>Not sure what you mean by this - Winboard is a GUI and I was refering to the >>>>engines. >>> >>>How many winboard engines are there? Like 200+? How many UCI engines are there? >>> >>>Russell >> >> >>So the 2002 model automobiles are inferior because there are so few of them on >>the road compared to the pre-2002 models? > >Winboard engines have been booming as of late. It's a trend. I just didn't see >how "UCI is the future" when Winboard engines are being created left and right. >I really see no comparison between cars and winboard engines here. > >Russell The analogy is simple: one is so new that its numbers are obviously going to be smaller. Looking at absolute numbers in such a case is meaningless. What is the *rate of growth* in the number of available UCI engines vs. Winboard engines in the past 12 months?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.