Author: Dirk Frickenschmidt
Date: 10:54:09 08/14/98
Hi Thorsten, seems you rather want to repeat defamations than ending them. So I have to make it more clear to you where I have to protest. If necessary I will contact the moderators, still hoping you will quit your defamation efforts. You wrote to Enrique Irazoqui: >there was no compain against chessBase. >Dirk has worked for chessbase before. Moritz does. >You are all working for chessBase. In plain words: It is a dirty lie anytime you say that Enrique, Moritz and Dirk "are all working for Chessbase". Enrique and Moritz corrected you already. If you claim once more that I am "working for chessbase" I will contact the moderators immediately. In your answer to my complaint about your bad style you consciously repeated again: >All i said was: you, moritz and enrique work for chessBase. Again: better don't lie once more that I "work for Chessbase". Even to claim that I years ago "worked" for Chessbase from is a very misleading effort from, considering what really happened. You are sinking terribly deep... One more cheap sentence from you: >All i wanted to make clear is, that the people having very good results >are closely connected to chessBase. >This is known to me, known to my friends. >But maybe not known to the readers of this group. One more defamation effort. The SSDF-guys had and have similar results (see new list). Bruce Moreland makes similar experiences with server games against Fritz5, as he told you here. I could easily name more. They all never were "closely connected to ChessBase". Anyway your whole style of dirty allegations concerning me, Moritz and Enrique now becomes quite Tueschen-like in a way I can hardly believe and even harde accept. All the more as I have done *nothing* to provoke this from you these days. To Bruce Moreland you wrote about the autoplayer: >Of course you cannot await that people working for chessbase >will have a reason to make deep research into this area :-))) You have made it very clear these days from whom "one cannot await deep research", having wrongly named Moritz, Enrique and me as "working for Chessbase". You could well know how wrong your sentence is. May I help your weak memory? It was exactly the Enrique, whom you attack now in such a poor way, who in cooperation with Ed Schroder has tried to find out if the autoplayer works correctly. He has searched for truth in this matter much more seriously than you ever did. Of course the result - that the autoplayer did nothing unusual - did not fit at all into your former conspiration theories of secret and/or strange autoplayer or power book things going on. And it was exactly me, whom you try to defame as well, who in a longer phone call *not* too long ago (in May) offered you to find out about the reasons for different results (instead of writing provocative - not to say more - things you had already spread then). You then offered to send me questionable Fritz5 games for rechecking them with the autoplayer. You never did. Now you tell us you have problems to remember this phone call at all? :-) And finally instead of apologizing for your misleading allusions about me, now you, who has written hundreds of off-topics in computer-chess boards, tell me: >What is the sense of writing this in public dirk ? >Is it about computerchess ?! >Is it about any topic of this newsgroup ? In other words: you try to put me into questionable light here in the chess computer public first and then wonder why I answer to this defaming off-topic of yours at all??? >Do what you want. >And continue your good for for chessbase and computerchess...:-)) Writing smileys after one more childish and defaming sentence does not make anything humorous of it. It's just throwing more dirt after once having begun with it. Dirk
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.