Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 11:15:54 08/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2002 at 13:47:46, Robert Hyatt wrote: >Doesn't it depend on the definition of "ply"? If they use a nonstandard definition of 'ply', then it's meaningless to say that they did 18 ply and therefor must have been great. None of the papers imply they do anything like that. There is a very simple explanation that makes everything come out logical: they didn't do 18 ply but 12. But then again, that's not an acceptable idea to some people. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.