Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 12:16:56 08/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2002 at 15:15:08, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On August 22, 2002 at 11:13:11, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>You've explained why they might want to do this , but you've totally failed >>to address the branching factor. >> >>You are not going to advance 2 ply in nominal depth and get a branching >>factor of 4 *for 2 ply*. That doesn't make sense. >> >>-- >>GCP > >Your log extract shows no evidence of any particular branching factor, much less >a branching factor of four. Can you repost it, chopping less information? > >Dave By the way, please post all iterations for a couple of searches rather than just two iterations for a few. I think that would make it easier to see everything in perspective. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.