Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 12:32:32 08/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2002 at 15:15:08, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 22, 2002 at 14:37:07, Matthew Hull wrote: > >>On August 22, 2002 at 14:20:41, William H Rogers wrote: >> >>[snip] >>>... That they beat the worlds champ in 2 out of 3 is on >>>record, but that does not make them the worlds best. >>>Bill >> >>It does if no other program has done it or can do it. I guess we'll soon know >>the answer if the Fritz/Kramnik thing ever happens. > >Kramnik gets the machine before the match. >The interesting match is kasparov-Junior and not Kramnik-Fritz. > >I think that you should learn statistics and 6 games are too little data to >decide and stopping to play after these 6 games suggest that they know that they >were lucky and they want to give the public the worng impression by not playing >more games. > >I do not fall for this trap. > >Uri >Uri Let's put it this way. They are the only one's to ever get that lucky. But for some people, beating the World Champ in 6 games with a lot of skill and some luck (maybe even a lot of luck) adds up to zero. I think it adds up to > zero. Can you at least admit that?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.