Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 12:51:28 08/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2002 at 06:47:34, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >That does not make sense - it only does when you take the first number as >the nominal ply depth and the second number as the part of that that was >done by the hardware searches. So what does it mean when you have searches like this, --> 17. Be3 <-- 23/113:12 --------------------------------------- Guessing Qc7 3(4) 25 T=0 qd1d2 Pc5c4 pb3c4P 4(5) 25 T=0 qd1d2 Pc5c4 pb3c4P 5(5)[Qd2](25) 25 T=1 qd1d2 Pc5c4 pb3c4P 6(5)[Qd2](25) 25 T=2 qd1d2 Pc5c4 pb3c4P Qc7c4p 7(5) #[Qd2](28)##################################### 28 T=4 qd1d2 Re8b8 nf3e5P Pd6e5n 8(6) #[Qd2](28)##################################### 28 T=12 qd1d2 Re8b8 bc2d3 Pa6a5 pc3c4 9(6)<ch> 'ng6' --------------------------------------- --> Ne7g6 <-- --------------------------------------- 28 T=19 qd1d2 3(4)[Qd2](30) 30^ T=1 qd1d2 Pc5c4 pb3c4P Pb5c4p 3(5) 35 T=1 qd1d2 Qd8c7 pb3b4 Pc5c4 be3h6P 4(5) 35 T=1 qd1d2 Pa6a5 pa2a3 where you have depths like 3(4)? They can't have 3 nominal plies, where 4 of those plies come from the hardware, because obviously that's impossible.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.