Author: Georg v. Zimmermann
Date: 13:50:24 08/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
Hmm, not very great either. Duron800 , 38 secs :
^^ @@@@@@@@@
^^ ^^ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ ^^
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~
~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~
Sunsetter C3
(c) Ben Dean-Kawamura, Georg v. Zimmermann
See http://www.d2d4.de/sunsetter.asp for more info.
hash 64
Created 67108864 byte transposition table and 4194304 byte learn table.
[...]
14 0 2194 3407381 e4d2 c2f5 e6f5 b3c2 d2e4 g2g4 e4c3 b2c3 c5a3
14 1 3847 6122241 d8d1 !!
14 22 4305 6894768 d8d1 c2d1 f5f2 g1h1 c5d6 b3e6 f2g3 e6f7 g8h7 d1d6 e4
f2 h1g1 f2h3 g1h1 h3f2 h1g1 g3d6
15 238 15570 24185713 d8d1 c2d1
16 238 20428 31934019 d8d1 c2d1
quit
quit
On August 22, 2002 at 10:57:07, Andrew Williams wrote:
>Hi,
>
>PM just got squashed by crafty on ICC. The move where it becomes obvious what
>will happen is here:
>
>[D]3r2k1/1p3pp1/p3p2p/P1b2q2/4n3/1B2P2P/1PQ2PP1/R1B3K1 b - - bm Rd1
>
>PostModernist just didn't see this coming at all. When I try to search from this
>position, PM doesn't find Rd1 in 2 minutes. I'd really like to hear how long it
>takes other engines to find it.
>
>Here is the full game:
>
>[Event "ICS rated standard match"]
>[Site "204.178.125.65"]
>[Date "2002.08.22"]
>[Round "-"]
>[White "PostModernist"]
>[Black "crafty"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[WhiteElo "2550"]
>[BlackElo "2498"]
>[TimeControl "1800+10"]
>
>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Bb4+ 4. Nc3 c5 5. e3 O-O 6. Bd3 d5 7. O-O dxc4 8.
>Bxc4 Nbd7 9. Qb3 a6 10. a4 Qe7 11. Rd1 h6 12. dxc5 Bxc5 13. Qc2 Rd8 14. Ne4
>Nxe4 15. Qxe4 Nf6 16. Rxd8+ Qxd8 17. Qc2 Bd7 18. Ne5 Rc8 19. Nxd7 Qxd7 20.
>Qe2 Rd8 21. Bb3 Ne4 22. Qc4 Qd6 23. a5 Qe5 24. Qc2 Qf5 25. h3 Rd1+ 26. Qxd1
>Qxf2+
>{PostModernist resigns} 0-1
>
>Thanks for any information.
>
>Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.