Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Blue - The Conclusion of the Matter

Author: Peter Hegger

Date: 19:35:25 08/22/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 22, 2002 at 18:19:17, Keith Ian Price wrote:

>On August 22, 2002 at 10:04:37, Peter Hegger wrote:
>
>>On August 22, 2002 at 08:10:27, Matthew Hull wrote:
>>
>>>2.  Hsu's creations _slaughtered_ the computer competition...ALL OF THEM!
>>
>>They did? Where are the game scores? I know that they claimed to have scored
>>around 90% against other programs during testing, but no game scores exist for
>>these games.
>>Are we to simply take their word for it that these games actually happened?
>
><snip>
>
>>Regards,
>>Peter
>
>I talked to Hsu and asked him specifically about this. He said he did not save
>the game scores. I listened to his answer while looking him in the eye and I
>believed him. What do you base your assertion that he is lying on? I am inclined
>to take a person's word without the personal interview, but in this case I had
>that added benefit. I don't really care if DB would beat today's programs or
>not, since it does not exist any longer, but I do not like people calling Hsu a
>liar with no evidence. If you have some, please post it.
>
>kp

Proof? Evidence? I'm not the one who made the claims about my programs prowess.
But if I did, then I'd surely have game scores to back myself up. If I didn't
have the scores then I would keep my mouth shut.
As I stated in the part you snipped, time on a supercomputer doesn't come cheap.
Atleast not cheap enough to play dozens of games just for fun.
Peter







This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.