Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Blue - The Conclusion of the Matter

Author: Matthew Hull

Date: 11:38:04 08/23/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 23, 2002 at 10:05:02, Albert Silver wrote:

>>Well, give them a break then.  Yeah, the logs weren't available, the re-match
>>didn't happen. Just a lot of stuff they hadn't planned for happened and didn't
>>happen.
>
>The logs are available for download at the IBM site of DB.
>
>>
>>From the outside, I guess their behavior looked strange, rude, unaccountable.
>>But if you think about it (especially if you've ever worked in a
>>mega-corporation), it makes perfect sense.
>>
>>Why people can't see this is beyond me.  Why do we need to hear you guys
>>discredit their work, belittle their playing strength, and pooh pooh their
>>victory?  What is there to be learned from such stuff?
>>
>>All the other DT/DB machines were the best.  DB2 was surely that and much more.
>>
>>Why is that so hard to accept?
>
>I agree completely. I also agree with your use of "were" and "was".
>
>>You will say "I analyzed the games.  They didn't impress me".  Yet they were
>>good enough to rattle and _defeat_ THE WORLD CHAMPION.
>>
>>Even THE WORLD CHAMPION HIMSELF was impressed with at least _one_ move.
>
>Sort of. He claimed that the move was evidence of cheating as neither Fritz nor
>Hiarcs would play it after any length of time. Only the WC can explain why he
>thought DB would play like a souped up Fritz or Hiarcs.
>
>>I'd bet GNUChess running on a 10ghz processor could beat today's commercials on
>>their 2ghz machines.  Surely, DB2 would have an even greater speed advantage.
>
>I'm 100% sure it would get clobbered. It might interest you to know that in the
>SSDF matches played for Hiarcs 8, Hiarcs 8 running on an Athlon 1200 MHz lost to
>Junior 7 running on a K62-450 MHz. Not a common occurence to be sure, but it
>does illustrate that speed is not everything.
>
>                                       Albert


We're not talking about 2x 3x or 4x speed differential, are we.  If speed is 50x
or 100x and the eval is decent, it will be _enough_.  But for some reason,
people have difficulty with their sense of proportion, and can't tell the
difference between 4x and 100x.  Fascinating.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.