Author: blass uri
Date: 01:36:02 08/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 1998 at 04:11:23, odell hall wrote: > > >Excuse me for saying so but I thought this whole experiment was soppose to be >about measuring the strength of the top programs relative to grandmasters. Why >on Earth would you choose "Tiger" of all programs?? It is certainly not the >strongest? What does this one game really prove? I feel dissappointed and let >Down!! Even Genius 5 which is presently ninth on the ssdf list would have been >better!! How do you know that Chesstiger is not the strongest?. It is a new program and is not in the ssdf list. It has good results against other chess programs. I hope Junior5 is a better program but there is no evidence for this. Chesstiger11.5 won Junior5 with white and probably does a draw with black in the games that were posted. I think chesstiger did not play well this game but you cannot learn the level of chesstiger from 1 game. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.