Author: Harald Faber
Date: 00:07:14 08/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2002 at 11:52:28, Albert Silver wrote: >On August 23, 2002 at 11:28:23, Harald Faber wrote: > >>... ended by 12.0-8.0 in favour of CM. >>Currently running is GambitTiger 2 aggressive vs. Hiarcs 8, 7.0-5.0. >> >>Games, also for download, and results in the crosstable on my homepage >>www.harald-faber.de > > have you considered trying different settings for Hiarcs as you have for CM and >Gambit Tiger? > > Albert 1) GambitTiger plays only with the aggressive style, no more changes. 2) CM's only changes are the selectivity to 10, no big deal. 3) I haven't heard of settings for Hiarcs which are supposed to be stronger than the original ones. Nor have I found ones by myself. So what kind of changes in the settings should be taken without weakening Hiarcs? Very difficult with untested settings, right? 4) The test has the intention to clarify differences between pb=on and pb=off and not which program is the strongest. So it should make no difference with which settings I play. Generally speaking I prefer the default settings out of the box. GambitTiger is just because of my personal taste and because of the good result in my TOP-tournament, and I have reason to believe that CM plays stronger with Selectivity=10. Nothing more, nothing less.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.