Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 06:26:29 08/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 25, 2002 at 07:32:29, Uri Blass wrote:
>On August 25, 2002 at 07:16:08, Jeroen Noomen wrote:
>
>>On August 25, 2002 at 04:44:26, Tony Hedlund wrote:
>>
>>>[Date "2002.08.22"]
>>>[Round "1"]
>>>[White "Rebel Century 4 A1200"]
>>>[Black "Gromit 3.11.9 A1200"]
>>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>>[TimeControl "40/7200:20/3600:20/3600"]
>>>
>>>{156MB, Fritz7.ctg, A1200
>>
>>
>>Why is Gromit allowed to play with the Fritz7.ctg book?
>>
>>Jeroen
Comon cut the crap, a gromit book is going to get butchered,
where a fritz7 book is hundreds of points better. The germans
are not capable of producing a good book in an environment of
their own of course (under winboard, arena or
whatever non-chessbase). The sheer quality of the lines and
especially the wideness of the book, which all big hand given
in books share, it's impossible to say it is 'counter productive'.
Reality is that if they make a book of their own, that it's going
to be +2.0 before the opponent is out of book. In short if 2
strong engines play each other, that's shifting the statistical chance
too much.
>I do not know if the Fritz7 book is productive or counter productive for gromit
>because the fritz7 book was not designed for gromit.
You must not talk about nonsense of counter productive, you must
see what the alternative is. The alternative is no book or something
pathetic automatically generated.
>I think that there is a bigger problem for rebel.
>How is it possible that century4 is losing the same opening twice against
>shredder
>
>see http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?246740
>>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.