Author: scott farrell
Date: 06:53:10 08/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
Robert, Am I correct, in that you still need to be careful in doing too many extensions, and stopping from getting to the next depth? Many other types of extendions (like quiesence search) you never want to reduce your chance to get to the next ply. Obviously getting to the next ply is better value than doing more quisence searching. Is this the same case for SEs? or doesn't it matter if you are a ply less, but solving some tactical positions better? Scott sfarrell@icconsulting.com.au
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.