Author: Robert Henry Durrett
Date: 06:23:00 08/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 1998 at 09:10:25, Robert Hyatt wrote: >Since we are beginning to produce a pretty significant volume of posts, how >hard would it be to divide this thing into "groups" or "sections" or something? > >IE a section on purely technical questions/answers, a section on computer vs >human games/events/comparisons, a section on computer vs computer games and >analysis, maybe others? > >We have a lot of discussions going on, so many that it is hard to try to read >them all, and the subject lines aren't always the most informative either. :) > >Just a suggestion... > >Bob If there was an easy way to get the initial post of each thread, then you could quickly cull out [or simply ignore] all threads you don't care about [such as "dispute X"] and select only those which fit your individual interests. You would simply open the initial post to your desired thread, and then look at the bottom of that posted message to find those posts you had not yet read. For example, on r.g.c.c., I download the headers and display them as expanded threads. For those threads which I refuse to read, I click the "-" symbol next to the first displayed message in the undesireable thread, and it becomes a "+". Then I select the thread with the "+" sign beside it and mark it as read. Since I display only unread threads, then by jumping out and then back into r.g.c.c., the threads I marked as read disappear. I then proceed to read the threads which I care about. Why can't this be done on CCC?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.