Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 09:48:01 08/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 25, 2002 at 09:31:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >a) before protocol 3 is implemented someone else than Tim Mann > must take over winboard development (Dann Corbitt?) >b) problems will not go away of course unless protocol 3 is not > downwards compatible. Why does that make problems if it is backward compatible? If there is a new protocol (and the majority is new) and the old commands are simply still supported, then why is that a bad thing? If you encourage people to use the new features, and then they still use the old ones, they don't have much to be complaining about. Russell
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.