Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 15:10:06 08/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 25, 2002 at 15:12:36, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 25, 2002 at 14:32:09, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > >>On August 25, 2002 at 10:12:53, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>Why? >>> >>>It is important to get positions that you understand from the opening. >>>If the fritz book is leading your engine to positions that your engine does not >>>know to play then it is a disadvantage. >> >> >>Hi Uri, >> >>From this comment I can see that you don't know the Fritz 7 book >>very well. Because the strength of this book is, that it gives >>programs very solid and good positions. >> >>Playing with the Fritz7.ctg would make Chess Tiger 14.0 the number 1 >>in the SSDF, I am 100% sure of that. >> >>Jeroen > >I think that in this case they should test Chess Tiger with Fritz7's book. >I think that the ssdf list is for the customers and >I think that it is important for the customers to know the best combination of >program and book that they can get. > >If they say Tiger14 and Fritz book 2770 then it is going to be clear for >everyone that the leader is not tiger with the original book so I do not see the >problem. > >I do not think that they need to get permission because they have the right to >test everything that they buy and people who bought both Fritz7 and Tiger14 have >the right to use Tiger14 with Fritz's book in computer games that they play. > >Kure is going to get respect for his book if Tiger14 with Fritz's book can lead >the ssdf so I do not see what is the problem. > >Uri I have to agree with jeroen that tiger would do better with it. However i'm not naive. Of course SSDF isn't going to test it as that's most likely against the wish of their biggest sponsor. Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.