Author: Steve Coladonato
Date: 06:27:10 08/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2002 at 09:02:12, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > > >I (www.gemuh.de) am of the opinion that books should by law be limited to 14 >moves. This is enough to (almost) finish development and let the engines take >over with almost all fighters still available for the battle. >Engines should not be helped (???) beyond this point. > >Matthias. Matthias, I tend to agree with you here. It seems that "chess programs" are more a function of the "book" rather than the capability of the engine. Yet somewhere, the engine has to go out of book so why couldn't that be after 14 moves and why couldn't the SSDF provide a "standard" book for tournaments. Are they evaluating the engine or the book's author? Of course having a "standard" book means nothing if, in fact, the book usage is embedded in the engine as mentioned by other threads here. Why can't book calls be a routine separate from the basic engine code. But I don't program engines so I don't really know. It just seems that the engines performance is skewed way too far towards the book it uses rather than it's analytical capabilities. Steve
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.