Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: comparing 2800mhz intel to 2133 mhz amd

Author: Ed Panek

Date: 07:33:31 08/26/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 26, 2002 at 10:04:11, K. Burcham wrote:

>
>I am in the middle of an upgrade. I am trying to keep up with the latest
>benchtests at most of the top sites.
>
>both of these processors are overclocking with air cooling.
>I like the Intel 2.8 Gig processor, but the cost is almost twice
>as much as the amd. The 2.8 Gig intel is out performing amd
>in almost all of the benchtests.
>
>
>
>From Toms Hardware:
>"AMD's triumph took us all by surprise, and it didn't last long. In any case,
>the Athlon XP 2600+ could outperform the Intel P4/2533 in numerous benchmark
>tests. Now, Intel sends its P4/2800 into the fray. In this situation, the AMD
>processor takes the lead in only one of the benchmark disciplines, namely, 3D
>rendering under Cinema 4D XL R7. In all other categories with different
>applications, the P4 tops the Athlon XP.
>
>Once again, Intel wages war on AMD, fighting to attain the fastest desktop CPU.
>AMD is sure to launch the Athlon XP 2800+ soon (in October at the latest), so
>that it will be able to keep close on the heels of its arch-rival. Intel has
>also made preparations of its own, with the P4/3066 up its sleeve.
>
>At any rate, the real winner is the ambitious end user, who will be able to
>choose between the P4/3066 and the Athlon XP 3000+ by the time Christmas rolls
>around. Both the successor to the P4 and the AMD Hammer won't be available until
>next year.
>
>As always, price-conscious buyers who are interested in getting the best price/
>performance ratio are a bit better off with an AMD Athlon XP than with a P4".
>
>
>
>http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/02q3/020826/index.html
>http://tech-report.com/reviews/2002q3/pentium4-2.8/index.x?pg=1
>http://www.gamersdepot.com/hardware/cpus/intel/p4_2.8/001.htm
>http://www.viahardware.com/intel28_1.shtm
>http://www.hardware-unlimited.com/reviews/pentium-4-2800/index.shtml
>http://www.hothardware.com/hh_files/CCAM/p4_28g.shtml
>
>
>Intel Pentium 4/2800A US$ 499
>Intel Pentium 4/2666A US$ 459
>Intel Pentium 4/2533A US$ 499
>Intel Pentium 4/2400A US$ 459
>
>AMD Athlon XP 2600+ US$ 269
>AMD Athlon XP 2400+ US$ 222
>AMD Athlon XP 2200+ US$ 269
>AMD Athlon XP 2100+ US$ 222
>
>kburcham


 I am in nearly the same boat. I just recently upgraded my "old" athlon to an Xp
1900+ running win 2kserver. I am fairly happy with the system and it outperforms
 my 800MHZ PIII on chess apps by almost 2X but not quite.

Now I am waiting until spring and the "Hammer" release to upgrade my PIII box.
From what Ive seen (hammers at 800 Mhz) they bench nearly to the equivalent of a
2X XP processor for most 32 bit apps (hammers at 800=Xp at 1600) . 64 Bits
should be even better.

I for one will wait and hopefully my Xmas work bonus will be enough to get an
entry level Hammer which should debut around 2GhZ!!

Id wait a little longer if I were you.

Ed



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.