Author: José Carlos
Date: 07:45:55 08/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2002 at 10:38:28, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > >> >>I think it would be interesting if championships were played without books and >>just with learning, but it's not sufficiently verifiable for the same reason as >>above. >> >>Regards, >>Mogens > > >Hi Mogens, >another problem is that the outcome of the tournament is influenced by who I >face first. If I (my engine) first face super-strong opponents who would win >even blindfolded against me, I profit. This is because I build a good book in >these first games that I should have lost anyway, then I face the weaker guys >and use the book. > >Matthias. For such a test, I'd do 1000 automated games RR among all players, then forget about the results, disable learning, and play a normal tournament. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.