Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Book vs. Engine

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 08:49:02 08/26/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 26, 2002 at 09:02:17, José Carlos wrote:

>I myself don't make a difference between "program" and
>"engine", but some do.

I see it as a difference between instructions and data. When someone creates a
chess program that doesn't make use of data, and only instructions, then maybe
I'll consider the idea that the book isn't part of the program.

People complain about books but they don't complain about lookup tables or
values for the pieces. To me it's just data. The fact that one set of data is
simply larger than the other and is more convieniently stored in a file rather
than in the executable shouldn't matter. If you think we should get rid of some
data but not other data, that's hypocritical IMO.

I agree with you José. I think it's about creating the strongest chess playing
entity. If that's a computer that uses a giant lookup file, great. If it's a
biological method where you mix chemicals and make a move depending on what
color the resulting chemical is, great. How the program decides on it's move is
irrelevant IMO.

Russell



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.