Author: Johan Hutting
Date: 08:49:28 08/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2002 at 09:47:58, Uri Blass wrote: >I understand now. I was suprised myself, but somehow it seems logical. >It is not going to be possible in more than 90% of the cases against movei even >with 1.e4 a6 because even in this worse position I do not expect repetition. Depends on your contempt factor I guess. > >Even if celes does not know about repetition it is going to try to improve the >position and not to repeat. You understimate knowledge. The improvement is based upon the knowledge the engine has, if it doesn't know the "best" move leads to a draw by repetion, how will it choose to avoid it?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.