Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Fritz 7, kns increase test

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 12:55:13 08/26/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 26, 2002 at 01:03:39, John Merlino wrote:

>On August 25, 2002 at 20:42:09, K. Burcham wrote:
>
>>
>>CCC-4 test position  Rg4
>>
>>hash set at 432 megs all tests
>>
>>Deep Fritz 7,  2 x 1533 mhz,  14:10 minutes,     1686 kns
>>Deep Fritz 7,  1 x 1533 mhz,  31:05 minutes,      947 kns
>>Deep Fritz 6,  2 x 1533 mhz,  not found,         1290 kns
>>Deep Fritz 6,  1 x 1533 mhz,  did not find,      1160 kns
>>
>>
>> [D] 8/4K2p/6pr/5pk1/1pB2R2/p4PP1/8/8 w - - 0 1
>
>Chessmaster 9000, on a humble PIII-733, finds Rg4+ in 30 seconds. However, it
>does not see that it is winning after five minutes, and it appears that CM9000
>would need to get to about depth 18 or 19 to see the win:
>
>Time	Depth	Score	Positions	Moves
>0:00	1/6	-0.91	17550		1.Bd5 b3 2.Bxb3 Rh3 3.Ra4 Rxg3
>0:00	2/7	-1.02	33219		1.Bd5 b3 2.Bxb3 Rh3 3.Ra4 Rxg3
>					4.Bd5
>0:01	3/8	-0.68	97813		1.Bd5 b3 2.Bxb3 Rh3 3.Ra4 Rxg3
>					4.Bd5 h5 5.Rxa3
>0:02	4/9	-0.68	243493		1.Bd5 b3 2.Bxb3 Rh3 3.Ra4 Rxg3
>					4.Bd5 h5 5.Rxa3
>0:08	5/10	-0.44	837489		1.Bd5 b3 2.Bxb3 Rh3 3.Ra4 Rxg3
>					4.Bd5 h5 5.Rxa3 Rg1 6.Ra4
>0:19	6/11	-0.47	2117898		1.Bd5 b3 2.Bxb3 Rh3 3.Ra4 Rxg3
>					4.Bd5 h5 5.Rxa3 Rg1 6.Kd6
>0:30	6/11	0.27	3547695		1.Rg4+ fxg4 2.f4+ Kh5 3.Bf7 b3
>					4.Bxb3 g5 5.Bf7+ Rg6 6.f5 Kh6 7.fxg6
>					hxg6 8.Kf6 Kh5 9.Bxg6+ Kh6
>0:34	7/12	0.00	4080860		1.Rg4+ fxg4 2.f4+ Kh5 3.Bf7 b3
>					4.Bxb3 g5 5.Bf7+ Rg6 6.f5 a2 7.fxg6
>					a1=Q 8.g7+ Kh6 9.g8=Q Qf6+ 10.Kf8
>					Qe7+ 11.Kxe7
>1:20	8/13	0.00	10095261	1.Rg4+ fxg4 2.f4+ Kh5 3.Bf7 b3
>					4.Bxb3 g5 5.Bf7+ Rg6 6.f5 a2 7.fxg6
>					a1=Q 8.g7+ Kh6 9.g8=Q Qf6+ 10.Kf8
>					Qe7+ 11.Kxe7
>3:50	9/14	0.00	26956945	1.Rg4+ fxg4 2.f4+ Kh5 3.Bf7 b3
>					4.Bxb3 g5 5.Bf7+ Rg6 6.f5 a2 7.fxg6
>					a1=Q 8.g7+ Kh6 9.g8=Q Qf6+ 10.Kxf6
                                                           ^
                                                           |
                                                           |
Did CM9000 not see "9.g8=N mate" instead of "9.g8=Q" in those last two PVs?

(Would it overlook a mate in 1 in preference of a non-mating move in the
lookahead?  If so, is that because it involves an underpromotion?)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.