Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 04:07:03 08/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2002 at 13:23:17, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On August 26, 2002 at 12:34:13, Tony Hedlund wrote: > >>If it hasn't been tested, how can you say that it's "probably the strongest"? >>;-) > >It's been tested by users in various configurations with promising results. The >same way as most of the other programs on your list. Therefore the term >"probably strongest" is applied. > >Every time there's been a suggestion to test an amateur engine, the excuse have >been lack of time. And now, when the schedule allows another entry, you choose >Gromit. I have nothing against the engine, but its status as privateware is a >problem. Kai Skibbe just asked at the right moment. It's as simple as that. >The question still remains. Why test an engine unavailable to anyone but the >fortunate few? I wasn't aware of that. Since Gromit 3.1 was on the Young Talent CD I assumed that 3.11.9 would be available for download from Chessbase. Tony >Regards, >Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.