Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kramer Vs Kramer (Crude estimate of the value of an amateur book )

Author: Arturo Ochoa

Date: 05:13:11 08/27/02

Go up one level in this thread


>>I don´t know what thing is called "Movei". I suppose is your private program or
>>so. If you declare that this program without knowledge can solve the big
>>majority of the cases, I would like to know what is "Big majority": 90%, 95%,
>>99%.
>
>I guess 90%
>

Ok, you have solved the strategical problems of close positions, My compliments
is you have reached that without "almost knowledge". I must admit that I am
admired.

>>
>>I would be admired to believe that this program is competing at the same level
>>of Gandalf, Yace or Insomniac without requiring a tuned book?
>
>No
>It is not close to the level of yace
>
>A previous version that is at similiar level to the last version with a very
>small books of less than 1 kbytes(I have one book for white and one book for
>black)
>lost 40-10 against yace that used only defensive learning to avoid losing the
>same game twice.
>

These were Blitz Games? I only run medium time control games (40/40). Blitz
doesnt say to me anything about results.

>
>
>Strategy is often tactics+right evaluation if you search deep enough.
>
>Uri

If you say that Strategy is this definition, I don´t have another thing to say.

Strategy is not always tactics, the current programs cannot search to 40 plies
in 3 minutes to solve strategical problems. An the evaluation is slower and
slower when the programs has more and more knowledge and there are many
positions when the strategical problems are not solve by tactics.

If you can do it with any program, it should a great sensation.-

But tell me, any program is searching at 40 plies in 3 minutes?

Arturo.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.