Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:37:53 08/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2002 at 08:13:11, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>I don´t know what thing is called "Movei". I suppose is your private program or >>>so. If you declare that this program without knowledge can solve the big >>>majority of the cases, I would like to know what is "Big majority": 90%, 95%, >>>99%. >> >>I guess 90% >> > >Ok, you have solved the strategical problems of close positions, My compliments >is you have reached that without "almost knowledge". I must admit that I am >admired. I was talking about the opening stage and in most of the cases you do not need to solve strategical problems of closed positions at that stage. <snipped> >>A previous version that is at similiar level to the last version with a very >>small books of less than 1 kbytes(I have one book for white and one book for >>black) >>lost 40-10 against yace that used only defensive learning to avoid losing the >>same game twice. >> > >These were Blitz Games? I only run medium time control games (40/40). Blitz >doesnt say to me anything about results. Time control was 30 minutes per game+5 seconds per move. > >> >> >>Strategy is often tactics+right evaluation if you search deep enough. >> >>Uri > >If you say that Strategy is this definition, I don´t have another thing to say. > >Strategy is not always tactics, the current programs cannot search to 40 plies >in 3 minutes to solve strategical problems. An the evaluation is slower and >slower when the programs has more and more knowledge and there are many >positions when the strategical problems are not solve by tactics. I said tactic+evaluation and not only tactics. You do not need to see winning material and you can see better positions for your pieces or mobility advantage. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.