Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 06:49:40 08/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2002 at 09:39:48, Uri Blass wrote: >[D]r1bqkb1r/pp1nppp1/2p1Nn1p/8/3P4/3B4/PPP2PPP/R1BQK1NR b KQkq - 0 7 > >Mchess8 played 7...fxe6 and lost the game. > >I wondered if it is a book move of mchess8 or if there is another reason. > >This blunder appears in games 12522,12762 of the ssdf. > >It also seems that mach3 has a bug of resigning too early or losing on time >based on games 2764,2767,2768,2769,2772,2780,2799,2803 when in game 2858 the >opponent of mach3(Novag) suffered from the same bug. > >Game 1704 was the shortest game and Mcp5(66 mhz) resigned or lost on time after >the decisive 1.e4 of Mcp6(P90). Agreed ! A very impressive move ! -:) The last problem is probably due to the auto232 connection; the old DOS auto232 had synchronization problems - sometimes even in the middle of the game: either side had sent a move which had never been received by the other side. I had observed these effects occasionally. A unmotivated loss on time could also be due to this problem. If this is right, then it's definitely NOT a problem of the engine. IMHO, these games should not have been evaluated. Regards, Uli > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.