Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 10:52:29 08/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2002 at 13:24:22, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On August 27, 2002 at 12:29:23, Terry McCracken wrote: >>>nonsense. over those years ( i tested all those chess computers) >>>i have seen many units of those machines. any machine i got, >>>i read out the eproms. > >>Really? How did you manage that? > >buy them. read them out. play games, tournaments. save the games on HDD. >write articles about it. relate positions with different versions of >par ex, excellence etc. > >very easy. >when you see par ex making a stupid move, you take out excellence and >try the same position with this machine. and than you can see if it plays >better concerning this topic. > > >>ROTFL! Which is nonsense? Dan Spraklen wrote the programme, and it was based on >>the Excellence:)) > >this is no guaranty that it plays better with the pawns. >often programs make step backwards. > >i don't see any contradiction in that. > >i stay to my thesis that excellence had a better pawn play/handling >than par ex. > >and that 2 versions of par ex exist, one with a tactical strenght >playing ugly double/trippe pawns, no idea about passed pawns/pawn pushing >and minority attack with pawns, and another one that plays like the excellence. > >that means: good pawn handling. > >maybe i still have the games that support my sayings. i can research for the >games / positions, if you want. Sure, go ahead, I am actually interested. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.