Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 11:59:14 08/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
>I was talking about the opening stage and in most of the cases you do not need >to solve strategical problems of closed positions at that stage. This shows me that you cannot know anything about Opening Theory in Chess or you are dismissing the corrent fashions in chess openings. If you declare that, tell me then if the Current Programs are playing the King's Gambit all the time or maybe the Latvian Gambit (!?). I am admired of this declaration. But, I will accept tha fact that I cannot debate in this way. > ><snipped> >>>A previous version that is at similiar level to the last version with a very >>>small books of less than 1 kbytes(I have one book for white and one book for >>>black) >>>lost 40-10 against yace that used only defensive learning to avoid losing the >>>same game twice. >>> >> >>These were Blitz Games? I only run medium time control games (40/40). Blitz >>doesnt say to me anything about results. > >Time control was 30 minutes per game+5 seconds per move. > > >> >>> >>> >>>Strategy is often tactics+right evaluation if you search deep enough. >>> >>>Uri >> >>If you say that Strategy is this definition, I don´t have another thing to say. >> >>Strategy is not always tactics, the current programs cannot search to 40 plies >>in 3 minutes to solve strategical problems. An the evaluation is slower and >>slower when the programs has more and more knowledge and there are many >>positions when the strategical problems are not solve by tactics. > >I said tactic+evaluation and not only tactics. >You do not need to see winning material and you can see better positions for >your pieces or mobility advantage. > > Mobility or another factor are enough to establish a correct strategy. All the current programs sucks in several "strategical positions" when they don't have a clear plan. Instead, you reduce the strategical problem into tactics and a few factor. If this could have been solved, then all the programs could play a "perfect chess". I don't the feactures of your program. I am still wondering how your chess program without "almost knowledge" can solve strategical problems. Regards, Arturo.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.