Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 12:03:20 08/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2002 at 10:28:35, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On August 27, 2002 at 08:20:34, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On August 27, 2002 at 07:53:58, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>I have a single question to this interesting analysis: Why three different >>>engines and now Yace are establising a remarkable difference in this kind of >>>Matches? >>> >>>I would like to know: The Match Yace is not 12-6 for Yace with Book against Yace >>>without Book. >>> >>>Is this not remarkable? In other engines matches of the Top, the difference was >>>12-8, 13-7. Is this not remarkable? >> >>I'm not quite sure what you mean. Are you saying that Yace does better with or >>without book in your tests? I've done a limited experiment and Aaron did a more >>extensive one. Neither with advantage for the one using a book. Of course this >>might say something about my book :-). >> > >Ok, I will try to explain you (Remember: English is not my first language :) ). > >In the mentioned Match: Yace + Book Vs Yace NoBook is now 12-6 for Yace + Book. > >I am using your long uncommented book modified by me with other games + a >modified learning file that comes in the Yace Zip File. > >The score is an evident fact tha Yace is reacting very good with this modified >book whose original creator has been you. > >So, my compliments for you too. :) > > >>I think you should continue. After all, my criticism might be wrong. Just wanted >>to emphasize that there are different methods. > >Remember, you arguments are welcome for me because you are declaring vague >things. You are concluding interestings things that can improve such testing. I wanted to say: Remember, your arguments are welcome for me because you are NOT declaring vague things. You are concluding interestings things that can improve such testing. :)))) Sorry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.