Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I hope, that there will be standard for "analysis side" !!

Author: Omid David

Date: 14:32:17 08/27/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 27, 2002 at 16:03:49, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On August 27, 2002 at 13:36:49, Roy Eassa wrote:
>
>>On August 27, 2002 at 01:05:47, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>Yes I hope, that ALL engines and chess UIFs will display analysis evaluation
>>>same way: from current side to move point of view! The next best way is always
>>>from whites point of view as in Chessbase. But please all same way.
>>>
>>
>>I used to prefer that, but now I prefer the evaluation always being from White's
>>point of view.  (Chessbase has reprogrammed my mind!)
>
>
>I don't know whether it was them or me, to be honest.  But I took a lot
>of  flak when I made this change.  And at first, it took some thought to
>know what was going on when I would peek into crafty's log file and see
>-4.0 and think that it was losing, when it was playing black and winning. :)
>
>Now it is natural to me, just like chess diagrams always have white at the
>bottom.

Once I wanted to compare two algorithms under very short times. So I conducted a
few hundred bullet matches (1min/game) between to versions of Genesis. Now
looking at WinBoard's score, which each second changes from - to + is really
confusing. But if the score is only from white's point of view, it's easy to
follow the scores even in short time controls.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.