Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:58:32 08/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2002 at 13:40:17, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 28, 2002 at 13:23:47, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I believe that most amateur have simpler evaluation than crafty. >>I do not think that it is correct to call crafty evaluation primitive. > >The thing is that Crafty is open source. I can see everything Robert does, but >Robert can't see everything I do. This is pretty much true for any other amateur >as well. Because of this, I *know* my program has at least the knowledge >of Crafty, and quite a bit more as well. I assume most top amateurs have at >least taken a peek at Crafties code as well. Looking at the code is not enough and implementing the knowledge that crafty has is not simple espacially if you have different data structure than crafty and incremental evaluation. It is not impossible but it is not easy and I even did not try to do it. I bought few days ago from amazon the books that Migual suggested about C and I plan to read them before I continue to work more seriously on movei. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.