Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:15:36 08/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2002 at 03:16:01, Russell Reagan wrote: >On August 28, 2002 at 01:34:19, Chessfun wrote: > >>Not if the person is a member all e-mails are available through the search >>feature and for all we know the virus picked up the e-mail addresses there. > >Wow, that is one incredible virus! So you're telling me that this virus logged >on to www.talkchess.com, and then it registered for an account here, and then it >went through and picked up all of our email addresses from the forum, then sent >all of us a virus? LOL... As Pavel and others have tried to explain to you......yes LOL... >>I have never received one from him till now either, all the more reason to >>assume it's simply a virus. > >Congratulations! You figured it out. It was indeed a virus. Did you figure this >out all on your own? I think it's pretty obvious to everyone that it was a >virus, but there might be another poor soul who didn't gather that from the >conversation already I suppose... Not sure if can understand as well as you seem to be able to read. If you like I'll explain it for you.....nah probably better to simply leave it. >>Arn't you a sweetie.. > >Oh, I'm so sorry. Did I offend you by reacting in a non loving way to someone >who intentionally spammed a bunch of CCC members with a virus? You're right, we >aren't the victims here. Let's feel sorry for the jackass who sent out a mass >virus. "Intentionally" see you clearly have a problem understanding that maybe it wasn't intentional. Why be nasty about someone you know nothing about? you don't have to feel sorry for them but you can show some simple common sense. >>Since you already e-mailed them and informed them of a problem what would be the >>purpose of calling them....agh to lodge our complaints...thanks but since you >>already did that, I think it's simpler to pass. > >That's probably best. You don't have a clue what's going on anyway. And who are you to know? ohh yes I forgot you've been here since last Novemeber and your first (sic) few posts indicate who truly hasn't much clue. >>Albert's original post warned members about the e-mails. I myself got 1/2 dozen >>but do we simply open e-mail attachments for no reason. Come now this is the >>COMPUTER chess club isn't it?. > >As far as I know, you are correct once again. Did you get a masters degree in >"obviousness" by any chance? No but I'm sure I could, just as simply as you could get one for being a Moron! as since from the time you first appeared here, that's mainly what you act like. >>Personally I think it's probably some young kid who's PC has little/no virus >>protection. > >I think the problem is that you didn't do any thinking about this at all. Actually it's more apparent from the first paragraph that your the one who did little thinking. What was it, wanting to see your name in print? or just acting like a Moron again, as you are now and in the other posts where you have also used my name. >>Innocent till proven guilty rings a bell. > >No it doesn't. This isn't a court. This is the Computer Chess Club, as you >pointed out for us above. Innocent till proven guilty doesn't simply apply to being in a court. I see you should have spent a little longer thinking about this one. >It's quite trivial to see that this was an intentional attack. If you are that >thick headed that you really don't see how this was intentional, I'd be more >than happy to explain it to you. > >>Why is everyone so >>paranoid? > >Because this kind of thing has happened numerous times before. In the past it >wasn't viruses. It was email forgings, which do not happen by accident. So from your original "quite trivial to see this was an intentional attack" to "Sure, I suppose there is a chance it wasn't intentional". Seems again maybe you should have given some thought to your first post. >Goodbye, until next episode of Master of the Obvious, when Sarah will explain to >everyone at CCC how to install a new keyboard, because after all, this is the >COMPUTER (!) chess club. Line after line of abuse, what a nasty piece of work you are. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.