Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Proposal for a 3to1 time advantage

Author: David Paulowich

Date: 01:29:54 08/16/98

Go up one level in this thread



On August 15, 1998 at 13:34:31, Komputer Korner wrote:

>On August 11, 1998 at 04:13:47, David Paulowich wrote:
>
>>
>>Give the computer one hour for the first 40 moves and one hour for the
>>remainder of the game.  Triple the time limits for the human player.
>>Fairness is a nonissue here.  The goal is to allow human players to
>>perform at the highest level.
>>
>>I believe that the present FIDE policy of faster and faster games can
>>only lower the quality of chess.  We tend to forget the hard work and
>>detailed calculation behind a Frank Marshall brilliancy.  Incidentally, can
>>anyone tell me the time limits used in the Lasker-Marshall match?
>
>With a 3 to 1 time advantage and Crafty's guess rate of 50% on pondering, AND
>EVEN IF THE HUMAN GUESSES Crafty's moves 50% of the time, the time advantage
>reduces to 1.4 to 1. Even with a 1,000,000 to 1 time advantage the upper limit
>is only 1.999999 to 1. Just goes to show the power of pondering (thinking on the
>opponent's time).
>--
>Komputer Korner

	Indeed!  A 1.4 to 1 effective advantage sounds about right.  And next
year the computers will be 40 percent faster...  But human players do
not change their "clock speed".  In the previous century my proposed
time limit would have been considered too fast!

	Recently there has been discussion on how to attract grandmaster
opponents.  I say: grant them more time on the clock than the FIDE ever
has, or ever will.  We might even see a correspondence chess
grandmaster try his hand at over the board play.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.