Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: 0x88 vs. Bitboard

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 12:20:36 08/30/02

Go up one level in this thread

On August 30, 2002 at 11:52:09, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:

>On August 30, 2002 at 08:26:27, Omid David wrote:
>
>>What's the latest on the "0x88 vs. Boitboard"? Is bitboard still the most
>>popular implementation among the top programs? (while Crafty uses bitboards,
>>Ferret and DIEP use 0x88 if I remember correctly, right?)
>
>Ferret does not use 0x88, it uses pre-generated tables according to Bruce
>Moreland.
>
>Miguel


I thought he had said he used 0x88 for the board representation, but that
he didn't use it for move generation because of the pre-generated tables
you mentioned...

• Re: 0x88 vs. Bitboard Jeremiah Penery 14:24:42 08/30/02
  • Re: 0x88 vs. Bitboard Dave Gomboc 23:53:15 08/30/02
    • Re: 0x88 vs. Bitboard Russell Reagan 00:45:32 08/31/02
      • Re: 0x88 vs. Bitboard Dan Andersson 14:20:43 08/31/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.