Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 05:07:11 08/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 16, 1998 at 06:22:19, blass uri wrote: >Are there cases you think the better version in tactical positions is a better >player then the better version in quiet positions? The first time I got experience with this dilemma was when i tested Super-Forte B to C. Super-Forte B was better in tactics, but weaker in games. Super-Forte C had some extra extensions and was overall slower, but played better. It took time to find this out. In my first testing i was to shallow and disapointed. But than i thought: when Dave releases a new version, there MUST be something with it. I trusted in Dave's rational-efforts and tested version C again. Put the B-eproms out of the dedicated-computer and put C again in, and resarched not test-positions but this time games and positional stuff... and - suddenly I got it. This was long time ago, but i remember it because i was proud that i found a mistake in my own judgement ! My first judgement was wrong. And i found a way to step one step backwards and see the things much better. Sometimes you have to proof your own thesis. >I agree that if I see a game then the result of the game is not the only data >I get but I think there is not enough information by 1 game to be sure >which version is better. > >Uri ok- we don'T have to be the same opinion. Maybe it is a question of taste and experience. I have had good experience with my intuition. I trust it. I follow it. So my experience is good. If you have had the same experience with following data, thats ok to me too. The better if you come to the same results ! Concerning junior you seem to have the same idea about it. Its really stronger. you have seen that it has to play against chesstiger 11.2 in the fourth round ?! will be interesting to see the NEW junior play against the OLD tiger version...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.