Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:24:41 08/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2002 at 12:54:35, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 28, 2002 at 12:13:11, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 28, 2002 at 11:01:52, Jayakumar Ramanathan wrote: >> >>the truth is that all you will find out is a very primitif information >>about it in programs like gnuchess and crafty which are open source. >> >>the real good evaluations are top secret, both from most amateurs as well >>as from commercials. so please what you see in these programs gives >>a good idea how it works. it doesn't represent quantity or quality of >>the real ones. >> > > > >The inverse is also true. Just because you _can't_ see it doesn't mean >that the quantity/quality is any better than what you _can_ see... In military sciences as in highly sensitive State sciences the exact details are never published. Please do elaborate how secrecies entered into CC! What is the tradition? Or did it start with DEEP BLUE? And then, how do you feel when you one time have to defend the factual reality of the invisible (matches of DB2 against commercial progs) and then here you remind us of the existence of the claimed real in opposition to the invisible. Do you see any need to reform "classical" CC? Rolf Tueschen > > >>>What is the best place to read about how chess evaluation functions are >>>constructed? I am not an expert in programming but would like to know the >>>details of how numerical values are assigned to various positional concepts >>>(material, open files, etc.) and how they are weighted in the final value that >>>the routine outputs. >>> >>>Thanks in advance, >>>diomedesX
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.